Chicago plan not enough to protect migrating birds, advocates say

US

Annette Prince peered between glossy downtown buildings: ”There’s a bird in that grate.”

Sure enough, sitting very still in the rain was a tiny white-throated sparrow, so drenched you could barely make out its canary-yellow face markings. The bird was too dazed to move — an easy target for the hungry seagulls that were patrolling the area.

Prince looked up at the nearest skyscraper, with its rows of dark windows.

“He probably hit the glass up there and fell down,” she said.

A long-awaited policy update from the city of Chicago is supposed to help prevent such injuries and deaths, which occur by the thousands each year when migrating birds crash into local buildings.

But Chicago bird safety advocates say they are disappointed that the city’s policy update, now in draft form, does not make bird safety measures mandatory.

Instead, anti-collision measures, which can include installing glass with tiny markings, are included in a menu of sustainable design options from which developers working on affected projects can pick and choose.

“We feel it’s not adequate,” said Prince, chair of Bird Friendly Chicago, a coalition of local birding and conservation groups that’s been working for bird-safe building measures since 2016.

“(These measures) are not just bonuses — they’re essential to protecting valuable bird lives and a healthy environment, that these birds are foundational to. They’re good for people. They’re good for birds,” she said.

Chicago Department of Planning and Development Deputy Commissioner Peter Strazzabosco pointed out that the proposed policy update, available for public comment until May 15, gives additional weight to bird-safe building options.

Director of Chicago Bird Collision Monitors Annette Prince holds a sora rail found by another volunteer as they patrol the downtown area collecting dead and injured birds on April 29, 2024. (Antonio Perez/Chicago Tribune)

Under the update, one category of bird safety measures would be awarded 30 points, compared with just 10 points under the current policy.

Those points count toward the 100 points that certain new buildings and renovations must earn — by choosing from a list of sustainability options — if the project developers want the city’s permission to build.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Greg Abbott’s Four-Word Response After University’s DEI Ruling
Michael Cohen expected to take stand in Trump trial on Monday
US Let Putin ‘Rampage’ in Ukraine, Ex-President Says
Man in Colorado Ballet musician’s drunk-driving death pleads guilty
Readers sound off on the American flag, attacking Rafah and AI companionship

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *